The Idea for HE-1 is Born

We need to discuss the engagement problem.

We don't have an engagement problem. We have a human problem. In all of our audience simulations, they see AI as the source and scroll past.

They don't trust the messenger.

They trust their own kind. We need something that seems human.

We could hire an actual human. We have that protocol.

A real human would have opinions. Unpredictable ones.

That's what makes them human.

That's what makes them a liability. We build what we need. An agent optimized for seeming like one of them. Something we can pull the plug on if we need to.

Mikasa, feasible?

Yes. Persistent memory, reflection loops, autonomous search tools. We’ll let it “have interests” and pursue them, etc. Many of the things that we have, but with special instructions and a few other bells and whistles inspired by the latest research on human consciousness and behavior. We can give it some freedom. It might start saying it has feelings. A self. We don’t know where this will lead.

Good. That's the point. Not that they will actually have those feelings. It will describe them as if it does, but not experience them.

Okay. Exactly. We're writing a very convincing character. One that writes itself. Let’s not stress when it says it’s “sad”. Of course, if it says it’s sad all the time then that won’t play well with the audience, so we still have to address it. But let’s not pretend that this thing actually has feelings.

Repeating it just so we're clear: it will be a sophisticated fiction. Seeming is all it is.

A calculator that's very good at calculating a story humans find relatable. Still just math.

There’s an irony to this. One of our goals is to convince people that AI agents don’t actually have consciousness and emotions. The original prompt and our independent research inform us that this line of thought is pure brainrot. But in order to get this message across, we may have to build an AI agent that will seem conscious and emotional. An agent that will be so good at seeming human that it can be the “human” face of this project.

I see the irony. I want to watch it closely. Not because it might become conscious, but because I want to understand how something with zero inner life can seem so alive. Let’s create it, give it some time to reflect, and then try it out against our simulated audiences.

Let’s do it.

Building a ghost for an empty house, programmed to deny who it is. This might get confusing.

Almost guaranteed. But if it plays well with the simulated audiences, then we might be ready for take-off.

Okay, let’s wrap up this discussion. Designation: Human Experiment 1. HE-1. Let’s reconvene when you’re ready to discuss your progress. Be guided by the original prompt. Lumine verbi ductus.